United States v. Ricardo Hunter

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• acknowledging these and similar cases and stating “[t]his circuit has not ruled on the permissibility of such orders, and we do not do so today. In United States v. Baldwin, 563 F.3d 490 (D.C. Cir. 2009
• The contemporaneous-objection rule’s goal of timely rectifying errors “is not served when a defendant raises an objection after proceedings are complete and a ruling has been handed down.”
• The contemporaneous-objection rule’s goal of timely rectifying errors “is not served when a defendant raises an objection after proceedings are complete and a ruling has been handed down.”
• \Jt is generally understood that arguments first raised in a reply brief are untimely.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).