Skip to main content
Second Circuit· 6/29/1995

United States v. John W.S. McCormick

Citations

  • 58 F.3d 874
  • 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 16068
  • 1995 WL 385905

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the court should “consider the basic principle that a consecutive sentence should be imposed to the extent that it will result in a reasonable incremental penalty”
  • affirming sentence where district court did not perform calculation under section 5G1.3(c) on the record, but computation was before the court in the parties’ written submissions
  • affirming sentence where district court did not perform calculation under section 5G1.3(c) on the record, but computation was before the court in the parties' written submissions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Oakes, Kearse, Cabranes

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.