Second Circuit· 6/29/1995
United States v. John W.S. McCormick
Citations
- 58 F.3d 874
- 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 16068
- 1995 WL 385905
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that the court should “consider the basic principle that a consecutive sentence should be imposed to the extent that it will result in a reasonable incremental penalty”
- affirming sentence where district court did not perform calculation under section 5G1.3(c) on the record, but computation was before the court in the parties’ written submissions
- affirming sentence where district court did not perform calculation under section 5G1.3(c) on the record, but computation was before the court in the parties' written submissions
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Oakes, Kearse, Cabranes
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.