United States v. Louis Margiotti, Jr.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a technical violation of Rule 32 does not warrant resentencing, where the violation is promptly corrected and causes no harm
• holding that in case where the sentencing judge forgot to give defendant opportunity to speak before announcing a sentence but then promptly rectified the error by allowing defendant to speak, the sentence was not imposed until after defendant allocuted
• holding that in case where the sentencing judge forgot to give defendant opportunity to speak before announcing a sentence but then promptly rectified the error by allowing defendant to speak, the sentence was not imposed until after defendant allocuted
• \Section 5G1.3(c) simply does not require the use of any particular verbal formula or incantation.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).