Skip to main content
· 8/14/1992

United States v. Albert Hudson

Citations

  • 972 F.2d 504
  • 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 19050
  • 1992 WL 194524

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • choosing not to follow Williams and concluding that the use of a noninherently dangerous object (a car
  • \the use of the dangerous weapon ... resulted in an increase in the base offense level by making the crime an aggravated assault\
  • “A defendant can not be guilty of assault with a non-inherently dangerous weapon ... unless the object is used (or its use is threatened) in a dangerous way.”
  • vacating and remanding for resentencing although issue not raised below
  • expressly ______ disagreeing with Williams

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Pratt, Altimari, Kelleher

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.