United States v. Solomon Sprei

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that District Court is in the best position to \decide what combination of circumstances take a case out of the ordinary and make it exceptional\
• finding that the MVRA applies to cases in which a defendant is convicted on or after April 24, 1996, the date of the enactment of the MVRA, even though the criminal conduct may have occurred prior to April 24, 1996
• “In interpreting Rule 51, [this Court has] emphasized that [a]n objection is adequate which fairly alerts the court and opposing counsel to the nature of the claim.” (internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).