United States v. John M. Garlich

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• directing district court to consider extraordinary acceptance of responsibility for exceptional restitution as ground for potential departure
• “Garlich’s actions in planning and executing the financing scheme over a one-year period were not ‘spontaneous and seemingly thoughtless.’ ”
• no aberrant behavior 2. This conclusion has since been bolstered by the Supreme Court's recognition in Koon v. United States, 518 U.S. 81, 113 (1996

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).