United States v. Terry O'Kane

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that defendant who defrauds his employer of $304,667 but only launders $73,562.50 “would be punished for laundering the total sum of $378,229.50”
• holding that a count of 18 U.S.C. § 1957 money laundering should not be grouped with mail fraud counts under either § 3D1.2(b) or (d)
• stating that “money laundering harms society’s interest in discovering and deterring criminal conduct, because by laundering the proceeds of crime, the criminal vests that money with the appearance of legitimacy”
• refusing to group money laundering and fraud counts under subsection (d
• \[I]t is clear that several separate money laundering counts could properly be grouped together under (d) . . . .\
• “[W]e do not simply squint at shadows on a dark wall; the Guidelines provide clear examples of the types of counts which should be grouped under Section 3D1.2(b).”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).