Skip to main content
Seventh Circuit· 9/20/2017

United States v. John Gries

Citations

  • 877 F.3d 255

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reviewing two “notice” definitions and opining that “[i]n everyday parlance, the term is not limited to warnings or notifications disseminated to the general public”
  • “When it comes to weighing the relevant sentencing factors, the boundaries of the district judge’s discretion are wide.”
  • “District judges have broad discretion to prioritize and weigh the relevant sentencing factors under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a). Appellate review for reasonableness is highly deferential.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ripple, Rovner, Sykes

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named United States v. John Gries

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.