United States v. Wayerski

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that Count 1 \was adequate to apprise the defendants of the charges and to plead double jeopardy in any future prosecution for the same offense\
• concluding that Count 1 “was adequate to apprise the defendants of the charges and to plead double jeopardy in any future prosecution for the same offense”
• holding that under Rutledge, a child-pornography conspiracy is a lesser-included offense of a child-exploitation enterprise under § 2252A(g)
• holding that it was not unreasonable for the district court to consider the defendants’ child pornography offenses to be serious and deserving of a significant sentence
• holding that USCA11 Case: 21-10695 Date Filed: 01/26/2022 Page: 8 of 8 8 Opinion of the Court 21-10695 sentences within the guidelines range are generally reasonable
• holding the “in concert with” element “requires the same proof of an agreement that would also violate [a] conspiracy [charge]” for the same predicate offenses

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).