United States v. Statham

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a co-defendant differed from the defendant for sentencing purposes because the co-defendant cooperated, pleaded and had a less extensive criminal history
• holding that a co-defendant differed from the defendant for sentencing purposes because the co-defendant cooperated, pleaded and had a less extensive criminal history
• applying § 2K2.1(b)(4)’s parallel strict-liability enhancement for use of a firearm with an altered or obliterated serial number
• vacating 51-month below guidelines variance where judge’s statements and sentence imposed painted “irreconcilable pictures”
• \We are therefore open in all cases to an argument that a defendant's sentence is unreasonable because of a disparity with the sentence of a co-defendant ....\
• va‐ cating 51‐month below guidelines variance where judge’s statements and sentence imposed painted “irreconcilable pictures”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).