United States v. John Corbin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming juror's <br>removal, but noting that removal was discretionary, not mandatory, <br>when the suspect statement seemed \more a piece of eccentricity <br>than a meaningful comment\
• “since it was not clear that the statement had been made or heard by anyone, more harm than good might have resulted from questioning each juror”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).