United States v. Pasquale Perrotta, United States of America v. William Agnos

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• article reporting that district court had characterized suppressed evidence as extremely prejudicial could suggest to jury the existence of “serious evidence” of defendant’s guilt
• article reporting that district court had characterized suppressed evidence as extremely prejudicial could suggest to jury the existence of \serious evidence\ of defendant's guilt
• “Inquiry of any sort need be undertaken only in those instances where the . . . court finds that publicity which has been brought to his attention is in fact prejudicial”
• listing cases to like effect

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).