Louis Neron v. James E. Tierney, Etc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “within a given situation, a broad range of alternatives, each different from the others, may suffice to alleviate due process concerns” in respect to claims of jury taint
• “[w]e have found no case which purports to lay down an iron clad rule necessitating post-trial interrogation upon demand of every juror in every circumstance”
• a decision to probe into juror decision-making “presumes a sufficient showing to undergird genuine doubts about impartiality.”
• question of bias based on juror’s relationship with petitioner’s relative
• discussing reguirements for Sixth Amendment claim of juror bias

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).