United States v. Raul Enrique Penagaricano-Soler

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “statistical disparity in relative incidence” of discriminatory and non-discriminatory prosecutions sufficient to raise prima facie case
• \statistical disparity in relative incidence\ of discriminatory and non-discriminatory prosecutions sufficient to raise prima facie case
• government introduced affidavit explaining that those not prosecuted had admitted to violation and, after court order, revealed more names in effort to rebut allegations of disparate treatment
• government introduced affidavit explaining that those not prosecuted had admitted to violation and, after court order, revealed more names in effort to rebut allegations of disparate treatment
• applying the abuse-of-discretion standard before Armstrong

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).