United States v. Michael L. Berridge

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• upholding the prohibition on a former bank vice president who pled guilty to fraudulent loan activity from obtaining employment in the banking industry during his period of supervised release
• affirming a special condition, even though the district court did not explain its reasons, where the justification was evident from the record
• finding a bank executive to be in a position of public trust in part because “[h]e had the authority to write off and grant loans”
• district court’s failure to explain the reasons for prohibiting a defendant, who was convicted of filing false loan applications, from working in a bank was harmless error
• describing this situation as one of “harmless error”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).