United States v. James Gooding

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that defendant’s \distraught\ and \nervous\ demeanor as he exited the plane did not constitute rea- sonable suspicion to justify investigative stop
• reasonable suspicion is determined by objective standards as they existed “at the time of the seizure”
• determination of whether a seizure occurred is generally one of fact
• determination of whether a seizure occurred is generally one of fact

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Other cases named United States v. James Gooding

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

• United States v. James Gooding
  Sixth Circuit· 2003-12-12· cited 7×