Tenth Circuit· 12/10/1992

United States v. James Easter, Jr.

Citations

981 F.2d 1549
37 Fed. R. Serv. 823
1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 32272
1992 WL 364173

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that evidentiary hearings are not warranted “when only ‘thin allegations of jury misconduct’ are present” (citation omitted)
finding a hearing unnecessary on a motion \based on pure conjecture\
\plain error review is not appropriate when the alleged error involves the resolution of factual disputes\
\plain error review is not appropriate when the alleged error involves the resolution of factual disputes\
“[B]ecause Defendant failed to raise this fact-dependent issue in the court below, he has waived it on appeal, and plain error review does not apply.”
disparity does not violate equal protection

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Seymour, Anderson, Baldock

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

111 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

54 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named United States v. James Easter, Jr.

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

United States v. James Easter, Jr.
Tenth Circuit· 1998-01-29

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.