United States v. Quincy J. Conway

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming admission of evidence of prior drug-related arrests as relevant to proving intent
• “We agree that the ‘firmly convinced’language . . . is a correct and comprehensible statement of the reasonable doubt standard.”
• “We agree that the ‘firmly convinced’ language, juxtaposed with the insistence that a jury must acquit in the presence of a ‘real possibility’ that the defendant is not guilty, is a correct and comprehensible statement of the reasonable doubt standard.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).