United States v. Paul C. Perkins

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• analyzing separately allegations of nondisclosure of information during voir dire and insertion of extraneous information into jury deliberations
• untruthfulness in voir dire indicates potential bias, which implicates a defendant’s right to a fair trial
• “A relationship between a juror and a defendant, albeit a re- mote one, can form the basis of a challenge for cause.”
• \Prejudice from extrinsic evidence is assumed in the form of a rebuttable presumption and the government bears the burden of demonstrating that the consideration of the evidence was harmless.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).