United States v. Samuel Ervin Mills

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that constructive possession of a firearm in a jointly occupied vehicle requires “some connection or nexus between the defendant and the firearm”
• explaining “disbelief” of defense’s evidence “cannot constitute evidence of the crimes charged . . . .”
• “Even if the jury disbelieved the entire defense testimony, that disbelief cannot constitute evidence of the crimes charged . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).