Skip to main content
· 1/29/2001

United States v. Frido Seesing

Citations

  • 234 F.3d 456
  • 2000 WL 1800129

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the district court failed to meet the requirements of Rule 11(c)(1) when it omitted an element of the crime, and that the error was not harmless
  • explaining pro se complaints and motions from prisoners must be liberally construed
  • courts will liberally construe pro se habeas petitions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Schroeder, Beezer, Hawkins

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.