United States v. James Carroll

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• remarking that because “[t]here is no bright line rule for determining staleness,” “we are not obligated to deem the information at issue in this case stale just because it is older than information at issue in any previous case” (internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).