United States v. Burkhart

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the \ 'passage of time alone' cannot demonstrate staleness\ in child pornography cases
• noting that the “‘passage of time alone’ cannot demonstrate staleness” in child pornography cases
• recognizing passage of time alone cannot demonstrate staleness and determining warrant affidavit information was not stale even though warrant was executed two years and four months after defendant's alleged last contact with child pornography distributor
• information pertaining to an email between child pornography distributor and the defendant two years and four months before issuance of a search warrant not stale
• internal quotations 5 Appellate Case: 22-1077 Document: 010110815825 Date Filed: 02/21/2023 Page: 6 omitted
• describing the “severe social stigma” associated with child pornography possession

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).