Skip to main content
Seventh Circuit· 2/10/2014

United States v. Sutton

Citations

  • 742 F.3d 770
  • 2014 WL 503439
  • 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 2499

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting significance of informant appearing in person before issuing judge
  • “[T]here is no bright line rule for determining staleness.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bauer, Cudahy, Posner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.