United States v. James A. Conlon

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “[i]t is clear that the government could have been more specific in the indictment” if it had wanted to
• “[I]t is settled that a bill of particulars and a fortiori oral argument cannot cure a defective indictment.”
• “There is a difference . . . between failing to state an element of the offense and being less specific than one could be in spelling out the acts that constitute the offense.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).