Skip to main content
· 10/30/2001

United States v. Smith, Arnett C.

Citations

  • 267 F.3d 1154
  • 347 U.S. App. D.C. 392
  • 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 23588

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • observing that the phrase ‘proof beyond a reasonable doubt’ is “quantitively imprecise” (citing Winship, 397 U.S. at 370) (Harlan, J., concurring); Lord v. State, 806 P.2d 548, 552 (Nev. 1991

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ginsburg, Edwards, Sentelle

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.