United States v. Jacques

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that when an informant asked clarifying questions about the defendant’s role in a plan to tamper with a witness, it did not rise to the level of a Sixth Amendment violation
• holding that no violation of the right to counsel occurred when a friend of the defendant cooperated with the FBI in speaking to the defendant through a series of monitored phone calls and the friend asked no more than a few questions that were not of “a probing nature”
• upholding the exclusion of evidence of prior alleged acts of sexual assault when there was “murkiness … with regard to whether, or how much, coercion was involved”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).