United States v. Hufstetler

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[Officers’] use of a family member uniquely tugs at a suspect’s emotions and thus can have an undue impact.”
• statement is involuntary if it is “coerced” and therefore not “the product of a rational intellect and free will” (quoting Lynumn v. Illinois, 372 U.S. 528, 534 (1963))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).