United States v. Jack Rose

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that there was no error in admitting expert testimony comparing the defendant’s shoe to a shoe print lifted from a teller counter after an armed robbery by masked men
• permissive use of automobile may provide basis for assertion of fourth amendment claims

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).