United States v. David P. Bizier

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that probable cause to arrest developed after an initial traffic stop because of observations made during the course of the stop
• stating that court analyzes officers’ collective knowledge at the time of arrest
• holding that “the period of time between the controlled buys [—four days after the second controlled buy and less than two weeks after the first controlled buy—] and the arrest was not so long here as to render the probable cause stale in any meaningful temporal sense”
• holding that “the period of time between the controlled buys [—four days after the second controlled buy and less than two weeks after the first controlled buy—] and the arrest was not so long here as to render the probable cause stale in any meaningful temporal sense”
• noting that “probable cause would grow stale only if it emerges that it was based on since discredited information,” but reasoning that the opposite happened in the case at bar (citing Watson, 423 U.S. at 432 n.5 (Powell, J., concurring))
• noting that “probable cause would grow stale only if it emerges that it was based on since discredited information,” but reasoning that the opposite happened in the case at bar (citing Watson, 423 U.S. at 432 n.5, 96 S.Ct. 820 (Powell, J., concurring))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).