Third Circuit· 10/26/1995
United States v. J. David Smith, David Smith
Citations
- 82 F.3d 1261
- 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 10317
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that “we must look to the entire record before the district court”
- holding that \we must look to the entire record before the district court\
- applying Liotard to evaluate a double jeopardy challenge to conspiracy charges
- “Undue emphasis on the alleged overt acts is precisely the problem we sought to avoid when we adopted the totality of the circumstances approach. That approach requires us to look into the full scope of activities described and implied in the indictments.”
- “The ultimate purpose of the totality of the circumstances inquiry is to determine whether two groups of conspirators alleged by the government to have entered separate agreements are actually all committed to the same set of objectives in a single conspiracy.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Stapleton, McKee, Gibson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- United States v. KempThird Circuit· 2007-08-27· cited 210×
- United States v. Percy TravillionThird Circuit· 2014-07-07· cited 146×
- People v. JusticeMichigan Supreme Court· 1997-05-16· cited 104×
- United States v. BrackettFifth Circuit· 1997-05-21· cited 99×
- United States v. RigasThird Circuit· 2010-05-12· cited 77×
- United States v. J. David Smith, in 98-6377 Steven Dandrea, in 98-6378Third Circuit· 1999-08-09· cited 71×
- United States v. PizzoniaSecond Circuit· 2009-08-19· cited 67×
- United States v. Joseph Merlino A/K/A Skinney Joey Joseph MerlinoThird Circuit· 2002-11-08· cited 18×
- United States v. RuhbayanFourth Circuit· 2003-04-07· cited 17×
- United States v. Laguna-EstelaFirst Circuit· 2005-01-12· cited 16×
- People v. WilsonMichigan Supreme Court· 1997-05-28· cited 14×
- United States v. Mier-GarcesTenth Circuit· 2020-07-28· cited 10×
- United States v. Scott AllinsonThird Circuit· 2022-03-04· cited 5×
- United States v. IrvingE.D. Pennsylvania· 2018-07-27· cited 4×
- United States v. RigasThird Circuit· 2009-10-21· cited 3×
- United States v. Trejilio Garcia-VasquezThird Circuit· 2023-06-05· cited 2×
- United States v. MerlinoThird Circuit· 2002-11-08
- United States v. JonesE.D. Pennsylvania· 2016-07-20
- United States v. JenkinsThird Circuit· 2009-08-19
- United States v. KempThird Circuit· 2010-01-06
Cites
31 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1946-06-10· cited 7,845×
- Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court· 1970-04-20· cited 4,277×
- Abney v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1977-06-09· cited 2,295×
- United States v. BroceSupreme Court· 1989-01-23· cited 1,790×
- Braverman v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1942-11-09· cited 848×
- Blumenthal v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1948-01-05· cited 757×
- United States v. AdamsThird Circuit· 1985-04-15· cited 282×
- Gnoss v. YoungSupreme Court· 1972-10-16· cited 183×
- United States v. TheodoropoulosThird Circuit· 1989-01-17· cited 177×
- United States v. KennyThird Circuit· 1972-05-22· cited 145×
- United States v. Sammy G. Daily and Frederik A. FiggeTenth Circuit· 1991-03-01· cited 140×
- United States v. Patrick C. RichersonFifth Circuit· 1987-12-02· cited 135×
- Adams v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1985-11-04· cited 101×
- United States v. Inmon, Martel A/K/A MartyThird Circuit· 1977-11-28· cited 99×
- United States v. Vincent PapaSecond Circuit· 1976-04-02· cited 81×
- United States v. Raymond M. KorfantSecond Circuit· 1985-08-26· cited 81×
- United States v. Whitney Benefits, Inc.Supreme Court· 1991-11-04· cited 81×
- United States v. H. Wesley Robinson, Leo W. Wilson, and Irwin W. MillikenEighth Circuit· 1985-10-31· cited 73×
- United States v. Alvin E. Young, Appeal of Robert GreenThird Circuit· 1974-10-10· cited 55×
- United States v. Liotard, RussellThird Circuit· 1987-05-06· cited 53×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.