Skip to main content
· 11/28/1977

United States v. Inmon, Martel A/K/A Marty

Citations

  • 568 F.2d 326

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • testimony at preliminary hearing to establish double jeopardy violation does not waive privilege at trial
  • defendant’s testimony at pretrial hearing on double jeopardy claim may not be used against defendant at trial
  • \Each of the twenty substantive counts in the second indictment alleges a separate offense.\
  • defendant could not be required, as the cost of litigating a valid fifth amendment double jeopardy claim, to waive the fifth amendment privilege against self-incrimination in a later trial
  • defendant could not be required, as the cost of litigating a valid fifth amendment double jeopardy claim, to waive the fifth amendment privilege against self-incrimination in a later trial
  • “Each of the twenty substantive counts in the second indictment alleges a separate offense.’’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gibbons, Weis, Meanor

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.