United States v. Raymond M. Korfant

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “conduct that is part of the same conspiracy is ‘relevant conduct’ under [U.S.S.G.] § 1B1.3”
• noting functional independence between agreements to fix prices in two regional markets might be conclusive factor leading to conclusion that there were separate conspiracies
• noting functional independence between agreements to fix prices in two regional markets might be conclusive factor leading to conclusion that there were separate conspiracies
• laying out factors to be examined in determining whether conspiracies involve factually distinct agreements
• “To the extent that Korfant and our other opinions in this area conflict with Grady, they are no longer good law.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).