United States v. Ignacio MacIas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Rule 404(b) evidence is “highly probative to show the working rela- tionship” between drug dealers
• where Rule 404(b) testimony was “brief and non- inflammatory in nature,” risk of prejudice was minimized

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).