Skip to main content
· 5/18/1990

United States v. Carl Leslie Buggs

Citations

  • 904 F.2d 1070
  • 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 8346
  • 1990 WL 64194

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • upholding district court’s finding regarding amount of cocaine involved, where each witness testified as to a different amount
  • permitting Indiana law-enforcement officers to testify that Smith and Wesson handguns were manufactured in Springfield, Massachusetts
  • upholding firearms conviction where police officer and lay witness testified that they saw “what appeared to them to be a large pistol. It appeared to each of them to be a .357 magnum but neither was sure.” (quotation marks omitted)
  • conviction upheld because inoperable weapon was \designed to shoot\ as required by 18 U.S.C. sec. 921(a)(3)
  • “We cannot accept [the] claim that the govern- ment is required to prove that the gun was operable.”
  • ATF agent testified that “Smith & Wesson handguns are manufactured in Springfield, Massachusetts. He also testified that a .357 magnum is a revolver and no revolvers are manufactured within Indiana’s borders.” (emphasis added)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Flaum, Easterbrook, Ripple

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.