United States v. Scott Franz

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “if we were to interpret section 3742(a)(2) to allow appeals for departure-related decisions as incorrect applications of the guidelines, we would render section 3742(a)(3) redundant”
• court is not required to depart in every situation in which it is allowed to do so
• \[c]ertainly we do not have jurisdiction over appeals that a party is not statutorily authorized to file.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).