Ninth Circuit· 7/10/2009
Kardoh v. United States
Citations
- 572 F.3d 697
- 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 15277
- 2009 WL 1978825
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Because 2 there were no criminal proceedings pending, the motion should have been treated as a civil complaint governed by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.”
- “There is no basis to conclude that the government acted here in bad faith. If there were, that would be a factor to consider in whether the court should exercise jurisdiction over or grant the claimant’s motion.”
- although a 14 criminal case, the doctrine was applied to resolve a civil issue, 15 that a party could not seek approval from the district court to 16 recover fees voluntarily paid in furtherance of an illegal 17 agreement
- although a 14 criminal case, the doctrine was applied to resolve a civil issue, 15 that a party could not seek approval from the district court to 16 recover fees voluntarily paid in furtherance of an illegal 17 agreement
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hug, Archer, Clifton
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- United States v. Donald Lawrence Ritchie, Heather Horner, Claimant-AppellantNinth Circuit· 2003-08-26· cited 2,266×
- United States v. Samuel KamaNinth Circuit· 2005-01-13· cited 233×
- United States v. William C. FarrellD.C. Circuit· 1979-08-27· cited 100×
- Terence Philip Ramsden v. United StatesNinth Circuit· 1993-08-18· cited 98×
- United States v. IbrahimNinth Circuit· 2008-04-14· cited 38×
- Eduardo Mantilla v. United States of America U.S. Customs ServiceThird Circuit· 2002-09-03· cited 27×
- Clark v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1880-12-13· cited 23×
- United States v. Adrian WilsonNinth Circuit· 1979-02-23· cited 15×
- United States v. James Lee SmithEighth Circuit· 1981-09-16· cited 15×
- United States v. ThomasFifth Circuit· 1935-02-11· cited 15×
- United States v. Ralph IovenelliSeventh Circuit· 1968-11-15· cited 13×
Other cases named Kardoh v. United States
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.