Skip to main content
· 7/10/2009

Kardoh v. United States

Citations

  • 572 F.3d 697
  • 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 15277
  • 2009 WL 1978825

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Because 2 there were no criminal proceedings pending, the motion should have been treated as a civil complaint governed by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.”
  • “There is no basis to conclude that the government acted here in bad faith. If there were, that would be a factor to consider in whether the court should exercise jurisdiction over or grant the claimant’s motion.”
  • although a 14 criminal case, the doctrine was applied to resolve a civil issue, 15 that a party could not seek approval from the district court to 16 recover fees voluntarily paid in furtherance of an illegal 17 agreement
  • although a 14 criminal case, the doctrine was applied to resolve a civil issue, 15 that a party could not seek approval from the district court to 16 recover fees voluntarily paid in furtherance of an illegal 17 agreement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hug, Archer, Clifton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.