Landry Dixon v. Toyota Motor Credit Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that arguments raised for the first time in a reply brief are waived
• citingUnida v. Levi Strauss & Co., 986 F.2d 970, 976 n. 4 (5th Cir. 1993)
• affirming the district court’s holding that the plaintiff did not establish diversity jurisdiction because he did not plead the citizenship of any party
• “TILA provisions do not apply to credit transactions primarily for business, commercial, or agricultural purposes ... or to organizations”
• \Arguments raised for the first time in a reply brief are waived.\
• “Arguments raised for the first time in a reply brief are [forfeited].”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).