United States v. Huskey

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that defendant's prior state convictions were de facto \consolidated\ under the sentencing guidelines because the charges \appeared in the same criminal information under the same docket number\
• explaining that government “must point .to evidence in the record that will convince, us that the district court had a particular sentence in mind and would have imposed it, notwithstanding the error.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).