Skip to main content
N.D. Ohio· 8/27/2015

United States v. Hinz

Citations

  • 126 F. Supp. 3d 921
  • 116 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 5887
  • 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 114003
  • 2015 WL 5085081

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • granting Government’s motion for summary judgment and entering permanent injunction under §§ 7402(a) and 7407 where defendant’s plea to criminal charges meant he was “estopped from denying the undisputed facts that show he abused the federal income tax laws”
  • “Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(d), three days must be added to the fourteen-day time period because Defendant was served the Magistrate Judge’s report by mail.” (citing Thompson v. Chandler, 36 F. App’x 783, 784 (6th Cir. 2002))
  • “Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(d), three days must be added to the fourteen-day time period because Defendant was served the Magistrate Judge’s report by mail.” (citing Thompson v. Chandler, 36 F. App’x 783, 784 (6th Cir. 2002))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Burke, Pearson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.