United States v. Louchart

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a district court can rely at sentencing on facts “explicitly admitted to by the defendant” in a plea agreement
• noting that “limiting the admission of facts from a guilty plea to ... those explicitly admitted to by the defendant does not keep the government from supporting a sentence with related conduct”
• noting that “limiting the admission of facts from a guilty plea to . . . those explicitly admitted to by the defendant does not keep the government from supporting a sentence with related conduct”
• “[L]imiting the admission of facts from a guilty plea to . . . those explicitly admitted to by the defendant does not keep the government from supporting a sentence with related conduct.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).