United States v. Henry Saunders

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “[w]hen a defendant is able to establish a substantial government interference, the inquiry moves to the question of whether it was prejudicial or harmless error”
• holding evidence of sexual-assault victim’s prior sexual behavior with defendant’s friend not admissible under federal evidence rule 412
• “When a defendant is able to establish a substantial government interference, the inquiry moves to the question of whether it was prejudicial or harmless error.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).