Skip to main content

Williams v. State

Citations

  • 681 N.E.2d 195
  • 1997 Ind. LEXIS 71
  • 1997 WL 302398

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming exclusion of evidence of victim’s cocaine addiction to prove a character trait of victim under Indiana Rule of Evidence 404(a)(2)
  • affirming exclusion of evidence that would have shifted jury’s attention away from the defendant’s actions to those of the victim
  • finding no error in excluding evidence that would shift the jury’s attention away from the defendant’s actions to the past acts of the victim
  • trial court did not abuse its discretion in refusing to admit testimony about witness’s prior drug use when there was no evidence of drug use at trial or at the time of the events related

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Boehm, Shepard, Dickson, Sullivan, Selby

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

41 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

30 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.