Darryl Colbert v. State of Minnesota

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “a postconviction court may summarily deny a claim that is untimely under the postconviction statute of limitations”
• stating that “a postconviction court may summarily deny a claim that is . . . procedurally barred under Knaffla”
• stating that a “new evidence” argument based on a trial exhibit was meritless because the evidence in question “could have been discovered by examining the exhibit” at the time of the trial
• stating that under Knaffla1 rule, “once a direct appeal has been taken, all claims raised in the direct appeal and all claims that were known or should have been known but were not raised in the direct appeal are procedurally barred” (emphasis omitted)
• stating that under Knaffla rule, “once a direct appeal has been taken, all claims raised in the direct appeal and all claims that were known or should have been known but were not raised in the direct appeal are procedurally barred” (emphasis omitted)
• stating that under Knaffla rule, “once a direct appeal has been taken, all claims raised in the direct appeal and all claims that were 5 known or should have been known but were not raised in the direct appeal are procedurally barred” (emphasis omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).