· 12/8/1977
United States v. Sherryl Lynn Grimsbo Henricksen
Citations
- 564 F.2d 197
- 1977 U.S. App. LEXIS 5709
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding government violated due process when it told the co-defendant that his plea agreement would be void if he testified for a co-defendant
- agreement not to testify in any manner regarding codefendant constituted substantial interference with witness’s choice to testify and violated due process
- agreement not to testify in any manner regarding 6 STATE v. SANCHEZ-EQUIHUA Opinion of the Court codefendant constituted substantial interference with witness’s choice to testify and violated due process
- agreement not to testify interfered with witness’s choice to testify and violated due process
- agreement not to testify interfered with witness’s choice to testify and violated due process
- defense witness intimidated by terms of plea bargain
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Thornberry, Roney, Hill
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.