Skip to main content
· 12/8/1977

United States v. Sherryl Lynn Grimsbo Henricksen

Citations

  • 564 F.2d 197
  • 1977 U.S. App. LEXIS 5709

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding government violated due process when it told the co-defendant that his plea agreement would be void if he testified for a co-defendant
  • agreement not to testify in any manner regarding codefendant constituted substantial interference with witness’s choice to testify and violated due process
  • agreement not to testify in any manner regarding 6 STATE v. SANCHEZ-EQUIHUA Opinion of the Court codefendant constituted substantial interference with witness’s choice to testify and violated due process
  • agreement not to testify interfered with witness’s choice to testify and violated due process
  • agreement not to testify interfered with witness’s choice to testify and violated due process
  • defense witness intimidated by terms of plea bargain

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Thornberry, Roney, Hill

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.