United States v. Hendrix

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• applying King to uphold a warrantless motel entiy because officers did not violate Fourth Amendment
• “officers were justified in believing the commotion in the motel room indicated its occupants were attempting to destroy evidence,” thereby creating an exigent circumstance for a warrantless entry
• motel room protected under Fourth Amendment as a house would be

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Dugan
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 2012-05-04· cited 24×
• State v. Campbell
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2013-05-03· cited 7×
• United States v. Cruz
  Tenth Circuit· 2020-10-09· cited 6×
• United States v. Garcia-Escalera
  N.D. Oklahoma· 2014-02-06· cited 2×

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Illinois v. Gates
  Supreme Court· 1983-06-08· cited 16,716×
• Payton v. New York
  Supreme Court· 1980-04-15· cited 7,618×
• Brigham City v. Stuart
  Supreme Court· 2006-05-22· cited 2,237×
• Kentucky v. King
  Supreme Court· 2011-05-16· cited 1,457×
• United States v. Cooper
  Tenth Circuit· 2011-08-15· cited 191×
• United States v. Salvador Parra, Also Known as Salvador Ledezma, United States of America v. Jose Alfredo Sotelo, Also Known as Ricardo Duarte
  Tenth Circuit· 1993-08-20· cited 131×
• United States v. Artez
  Tenth Circuit· 2004-11-17· cited 83×
• United States v. Luis Raul Aquino
  Tenth Circuit· 1988-01-11· cited 81×
• United States v. Harold Carr
  Tenth Circuit· 1991-07-25· cited 81×
• United States v. Polly
  Tenth Circuit· 2011-01-18· cited 77×
• United States v. Cruz-Mendez
  Tenth Circuit· 2006-11-06· cited 64×
• United States v. Quezada-Enriquez
  Tenth Circuit· 2009-06-05· cited 36×