United States v. Quezada-Enriquez

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• applying good-faith exception even though “the affidavit before us does not describe the basis of the informant’s knowledge and police did not corroborate any details”
• same, because reversal of the conviction “could provide Quezada–Enriquez with relief from the collateral consequences of conviction”
• “Once it becomes impossible for a court to grant effectual relief, a live controversy does not exist, and a case is moot.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).