Skip to main content
· 6/28/1966

United States v. Polly

Citations

  • 255 F. Supp. 610
  • 1966 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8003

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that Section 191 “provides for the recovery of wages for all hours worked.”
  • “[G]iving individual supervisors discretion to apply policies in a manner best suited to their department or unit is just the opposite of a system-wide practice that would provide the commonality needed for class action.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Craven

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.