Skip to main content
Seventh Circuit· 3/27/2012

United States v. Hampton

Citations

  • 675 F.3d 720
  • 2012 WL 1008932
  • 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 6222

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that making provocative physical contact with a law enforcement officer was not a crime of a violence under residual clause
  • holding Illinois offense of assault and battery on a law 33 enforcement officer is not categorically a predicate crime of violence under residual clause
  • explaining that “vehicular flight is inherently more risky than making insulting or provoking contact with an officer,” because such flight involves the “use of a dangerous instrumentality”
  • noting that using “hedge” words like “but” when referring to counsel would lead a reasonable officer to understand only that suspect might want attorney present
  • noting that the case law interpreting “crime of violence” in § 4B1.2 of the sentencing guidelines and “violent felony” in the ACCA is interchangeable
  • holding “ ‘Yeah, I do, but you . . .’ ” in response to law enforcement asking if accused would like a lawyer was ambiguous “because [accused]’s reference to a lawyer used the hedge word ‘but’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kanne, Sykes, Hamilton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.