Charles T. Lord v. Jack Duckworth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• ruling that when a suspect asks, “I can’t afford a lawyer but is there anyway I can get one?,” courts do not consider it a “clear” request for counsel
• holding that defendant’s statement that “I can’t afford a law yer but is there anyway I can get one?” was not a clear invocation of the right to counsel
• holding, in light of Davis, that defendant's statement “I can't afford a lawyer but is there anyway I can get one?” \lacked the clear implication of a present desire to consult with counsel” and \was ambiguous, at best”
• discussing presumption of correctness afforded to subsidiary questions informing the state court's legal conclusions
• discussing presumption of correctness afforded to subsidiary questions informing the state court’s legal conclusions
• discussing presumption of correctness afforded to subsidiary questions informing the state court’s legal conclusions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).